
What can I say? I was around when the Stonewall riots in New York City opened the door for gay pride and gay rights. Even before that the Mattachine Society and Daughters of Billus fought a pretty good fight, in good, respectable suits and ties of course. It's funny to picture it now -- in retrospect -- they wouldn't let me march one year becasue I was wearing jeans. I wore a tie and a nice long-sleeved dress shirt; but jeans were out of the question. And I had spent an hour ironing the crease in them, too. Today, gay pride parades lean more toward the outrageousness of it all -- it's a festival of colors and giddyness that we never thought of years before -- in all our seriousness.
Who knew Gay Pride could be "fun?"
I imagine tomorrow will be the same. Gay weddings will become outrageous performance art, with the proverbial brides maid-men in the tackiest of tacky dresses. As the gay community becomes more and more accepted, we press the envelope further and further down the path of propriety and become larger than life -- outrageous!
When my lover and I were creating a new life together back in 1977, gay men could not show any public displays of affection. Why, God only knows what would have happened had we -- yikes -- held hands, or -- horrors -- kissed hello at the airport! Propriety dictated to us that we keep ourselves in check. Even when the family came to visit us, we curtailed our affectionate hugs, pats, a quick pecks to behind closed doors.
Even now, in this age where gay men and women can feel the freedom to express their passions publicly, I find it still difficult to offer more than that special glance I gave him and the tender smile that telegraphed a simple message, "I love only you."
And somehow it's better, because it's silent yet he hear's it's message just fine. The "I love you" that comes all brassy and loud is fine for the gay kids of today; but for me, let me hear the silence of the love in his eyes.